Chevrolet Astro vs Toyota Previa
The Toyota Previa is more fuel-efficient at 18 MPG combined, against 17 MPG for the Chevrolet Astro. At EPA assumptions that is about $1,150 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Chevrolet Astro | Toyota Previa | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 177 | 54 |
| Most reported problem | Brakes | Brakes |
| Crashes and fires | 13 and 4 | 6 and 7 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 170,000 miles | 207,000 miles |
| Recalls | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 17 MPG | 18 MPG |
| City and highway | 15 and 21 | 16 and 20 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $4,850 | $3,700 |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 177 complaints for the Chevrolet Astro and 54 for the Toyota Previa. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 1 for the Chevrolet Astro, 0 for the Toyota Previa.