Chrysler Concorde vs Ford Taurus
The Chrysler Concorde and the Ford Taurus are rated the same on fuel economy: 21 MPG combined. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Chrysler Concorde | Ford Taurus | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 484 | 1,284 |
| Most reported problem | Transmission | Engine |
| Crashes and fires | 31 and 8 | 69 and 25 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 99,000 miles | 94,000 miles |
| Recalls | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 21 MPG | 21 MPG |
| City and highway | 18 and 26 | 18 and 27 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $3,200 | $3,200 |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 484 complaints for the Chrysler Concorde and 1,284 for the Ford Taurus. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 4 for the Chrysler Concorde, 4 for the Ford Taurus.