Dodge Dakota vs Ford Ranger
The Dodge Dakota is more fuel-efficient at 22 MPG combined, against 21 MPG for the Ford Ranger. At EPA assumptions that is about $150 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Dodge Dakota | Ford Ranger | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 240 | 531 |
| Most reported problem | Brakes | Brakes |
| Crashes and fires | 44 and 4 | 57 and 17 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 115,000 miles | 110,000 miles |
| Recalls | 3 | 4 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 22 MPG | 21 MPG |
| City and highway | 20 and 25 | 19 and 24 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $3,050 | $3,200 |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 240 complaints for the Dodge Dakota and 531 for the Ford Ranger. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 3 for the Dodge Dakota, 4 for the Ford Ranger.