Dodge Dakota vs Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is more fuel-efficient at 58 MPG combined, against 20 MPG for the Dodge Dakota. At EPA assumptions that is about $2,050 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Dodge Dakota | Ford Ranger | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 1,096 | 849 |
| Most reported problem | Suspension | Tires |
| Crashes and fires | 77 and 16 | 109 and 13 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 51,000 miles | 85,000 miles |
| Recalls | 5 | 3 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 20 MPG | 58 MPG |
| City and highway | 18 and 23 | 62 and 54 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $3,350 | $1,300 |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 1,096 complaints for the Dodge Dakota and 849 for the Ford Ranger. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 5 for the Dodge Dakota, 3 for the Ford Ranger.