Fisker Ocean vs Honda CR-V
The Fisker Ocean is more fuel-efficient at 92 MPG combined, against 30 MPG for the Honda CR-V. At EPA assumptions that is about $1,400 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Fisker Ocean | Honda CR-V | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 1,839 | 661 |
| Most reported problem | Electrical system | Steering |
| Crashes and fires | 30 and 7 | 34 and 3 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 5,000 miles | 8,000 miles |
| Recalls | 6 | 3 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 92 MPG | 30 MPG |
| City and highway | 99 and 84 | 28 and 34 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $850 | $2,250 |
| NHTSA overall safety | Not rated |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 1,839 complaints for the Fisker Ocean and 661 for the Honda CR-V. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 6 for the Fisker Ocean, 3 for the Honda CR-V.