Fisker Ocean vs Jeep Grand Cherokee
The Fisker Ocean is more fuel-efficient at 92 MPG combined, against 22 MPG for the Jeep Grand Cherokee. At EPA assumptions that is about $2,200 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Fisker Ocean | Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 1,839 | 712 |
| Most reported problem | Electrical system | Electrical system |
| Crashes and fires | 30 and 7 | 28 and 4 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 5,000 miles | 22,000 miles |
| Recalls | 6 | 21 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 92 MPG | 22 MPG |
| City and highway | 99 and 84 | 19 and 26 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $850 | $3,050 |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 1,839 complaints for the Fisker Ocean and 712 for the Jeep Grand Cherokee. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 6 for the Fisker Ocean, 21 for the Jeep Grand Cherokee.