Ford Mustang vs Nissan Rogue Sport
The Ford Mustang is more fuel-efficient at 84 MPG combined, against 28 MPG for the Nissan Rogue Sport. At EPA assumptions that is about $1,500 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Ford Mustang | Nissan Rogue Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 67 | 38 |
| Most reported problem | Fuel system | Forward collision avoidance |
| Crashes and fires | 6 and 0 | 5 and 1 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 5,000 miles | 83,000 miles |
| Recalls | 6 | 1 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 84 MPG | 28 MPG |
| City and highway | 90 and 77 | 26 and 31 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $900 | $2,400 |
| NHTSA overall safety |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 67 complaints for the Ford Mustang and 38 for the Nissan Rogue Sport. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
NHTSA's overall safety ratings: 5 stars for the Ford Mustang, 5 stars for the Nissan Rogue Sport.
Safety recalls on file: 6 for the Ford Mustang, 1 for the Nissan Rogue Sport.