Ford Mustang Mach E vs Honda HR-V
The Ford Mustang Mach E is more fuel-efficient at 100 MPG combined, against 30 MPG for the Honda HR-V. At EPA assumptions that is about $1,500 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Ford Mustang Mach E | Honda HR-V | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 680 | 82 |
| Most reported problem | Forward collision avoidance | Air bags |
| Crashes and fires | 23 and 1 | 9 and 0 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 23,000 miles | 36,000 miles |
| Recalls | 13 | 4 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 100 MPG | 30 MPG |
| City and highway | 105 and 93 | 28 and 34 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $750 | $2,250 |
| NHTSA overall safety | Not rated |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 680 complaints for the Ford Mustang Mach E and 82 for the Honda HR-V. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 13 for the Ford Mustang Mach E, 4 for the Honda HR-V.