Ford Mustang Mach E vs Nissan Rogue Sport
The Ford Mustang Mach E is more fuel-efficient at 100 MPG combined, against 28 MPG for the Nissan Rogue Sport. At EPA assumptions that is about $1,650 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Ford Mustang Mach E | Nissan Rogue Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 680 | 38 |
| Most reported problem | Forward collision avoidance | Forward collision avoidance |
| Crashes and fires | 23 and 1 | 5 and 1 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 23,000 miles | 83,000 miles |
| Recalls | 13 | 1 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 100 MPG | 28 MPG |
| City and highway | 105 and 93 | 26 and 31 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $750 | $2,400 |
| NHTSA overall safety | Not rated |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 680 complaints for the Ford Mustang Mach E and 38 for the Nissan Rogue Sport. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 13 for the Ford Mustang Mach E, 1 for the Nissan Rogue Sport.