Ford Ranger vs GMC Sonoma
The GMC Sonoma is more fuel-efficient at 22 MPG combined, against 21 MPG for the Ford Ranger. At EPA assumptions that is about $150 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Ford Ranger | GMC Sonoma | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 531 | 297 |
| Most reported problem | Brakes | Brakes |
| Crashes and fires | 57 and 17 | 23 and 2 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 110,000 miles | 115,000 miles |
| Recalls | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 21 MPG | 22 MPG |
| City and highway | 19 and 24 | 19 and 26 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $3,200 | $3,050 |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 531 complaints for the Ford Ranger and 297 for the GMC Sonoma. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 4 for the Ford Ranger, 2 for the GMC Sonoma.