Ford Ranger vs Toyota Tundra
The Ford Ranger is more fuel-efficient at 23 MPG combined, against 16 MPG for the Toyota Tundra. At EPA assumptions that is about $1,300 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Ford Ranger | Toyota Tundra | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 449 | 648 |
| Most reported problem | Cruise control | Body & structure |
| Crashes and fires | 53 and 17 | 39 and 2 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 57,000 miles | 87,000 miles |
| Recalls | 3 | 3 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 23 MPG | 16 MPG |
| City and highway | 21 and 25 | 15 and 18 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $2,900 | $4,200 |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 449 complaints for the Ford Ranger and 648 for the Toyota Tundra. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 3 for the Ford Ranger, 3 for the Toyota Tundra.