Ford Ranger vs Toyota Tacoma
The Ford Ranger is more fuel-efficient at 23 MPG combined, against 21 MPG for the Toyota Tacoma. At EPA assumptions that is about $300 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Ford Ranger | Toyota Tacoma | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 356 | 312 |
| Most reported problem | Drivetrain & axles | Fuel system |
| Crashes and fires | 22 and 3 | 20 and 2 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 19,000 miles | 6,000 miles |
| Recalls | 11 | 4 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 23 MPG | 21 MPG |
| City and highway | 21 and 26 | 19 and 24 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $2,900 | $3,200 |
| NHTSA overall safety |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 356 complaints for the Ford Ranger and 312 for the Toyota Tacoma. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
NHTSA's overall safety ratings: 4 stars for the Ford Ranger, 4 stars for the Toyota Tacoma.
Safety recalls on file: 11 for the Ford Ranger, 4 for the Toyota Tacoma.