Ford Ranger vs Ram 1500
The Ram 1500 is more fuel-efficient at 26 MPG combined, against 23 MPG for the Ford Ranger. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Ford Ranger | Ram 1500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 161 | 926 |
| Most reported problem | Drivetrain & axles | Engine |
| Crashes and fires | 10 and 1 | 36 and 13 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 20,000 miles | 22,000 miles |
| Recalls | 7 | 14 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 23 MPG | 26 MPG |
| City and highway | 21 and 26 | 22 and 32 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $2,900 | $3,700 |
| NHTSA overall safety |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 161 complaints for the Ford Ranger and 926 for the Ram 1500. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
NHTSA's overall safety ratings: 4 stars for the Ford Ranger, 5 stars for the Ram 1500.
Safety recalls on file: 7 for the Ford Ranger, 14 for the Ram 1500.