Honda CR-V vs Subaru Outback
The Honda CR-V is more fuel-efficient at 30 MPG combined, against 28 MPG for the Subaru Outback. At EPA assumptions that is about $150 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Honda CR-V | Subaru Outback | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 1,581 | 1,293 |
| Most reported problem | Forward collision avoidance | Wipers, windshield & visibility |
| Crashes and fires | 56 and 2 | 52 and 3 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 10,000 miles | 10,000 miles |
| Recalls | 8 | 3 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 30 MPG | 28 MPG |
| City and highway | 28 and 34 | 25 and 32 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $2,250 | $2,400 |
| NHTSA overall safety |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 1,581 complaints for the Honda CR-V and 1,293 for the Subaru Outback. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
NHTSA's overall safety ratings: 5 stars for the Honda CR-V, 5 stars for the Subaru Outback.
Safety recalls on file: 8 for the Honda CR-V, 3 for the Subaru Outback.