Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue
The Nissan Rogue is more fuel-efficient at 33 MPG combined, against 30 MPG for the Honda CR-V. At EPA assumptions that is about $200 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Honda CR-V | Nissan Rogue | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 661 | 1,092 |
| Most reported problem | Steering | Engine |
| Crashes and fires | 34 and 3 | 41 and 4 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 8,000 miles | 42,000 miles |
| Recalls | 3 | 6 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 30 MPG | 33 MPG |
| City and highway | 28 and 34 | 30 and 37 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $2,250 | $2,050 |
| NHTSA overall safety |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 661 complaints for the Honda CR-V and 1,092 for the Nissan Rogue. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
NHTSA's overall safety ratings: 5 stars for the Honda CR-V, 5 stars for the Nissan Rogue.
Safety recalls on file: 3 for the Honda CR-V, 6 for the Nissan Rogue.