Honda HR-V vs Kia Niro
The Kia Niro is more fuel-efficient at 113 MPG combined, against 28 MPG for the Honda HR-V. At EPA assumptions that is about $1,750 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Honda HR-V | Kia Niro | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 821 | 77 |
| Most reported problem | Wipers, windshield & visibility | Electrical system |
| Crashes and fires | 13 and 0 | 14 and 0 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 13,000 miles | 6,000 miles |
| Recalls | 3 | 2 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 28 MPG | 113 MPG |
| City and highway | 26 and 32 | 126 and 101 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $2,400 | $650 |
| NHTSA overall safety |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 821 complaints for the Honda HR-V and 77 for the Kia Niro. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
NHTSA's overall safety ratings: 5 stars for the Honda HR-V, 5 stars for the Kia Niro.
Safety recalls on file: 3 for the Honda HR-V, 2 for the Kia Niro.