Jeep Commander vs Nissan Pathfinder
The Nissan Pathfinder is more fuel-efficient at 17 MPG combined, against 16 MPG for the Jeep Commander. At EPA assumptions that is about $250 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Jeep Commander | Nissan Pathfinder | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 2,342 | 1,224 |
| Most reported problem | Electrical system | Drivetrain & axles |
| Crashes and fires | 112 and 18 | 16 and 0 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 78,000 miles | 96,000 miles |
| Recalls | 5 | 3 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 16 MPG | 17 MPG |
| City and highway | 14 and 18 | 14 and 21 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $4,200 | $3,950 |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 2,342 complaints for the Jeep Commander and 1,224 for the Nissan Pathfinder. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 5 for the Jeep Commander, 3 for the Nissan Pathfinder.