Kia Sedona vs Pontiac Montana
The Pontiac Montana is more fuel-efficient at 20 MPG combined, against 16 MPG for the Kia Sedona. At EPA assumptions that is about $850 less in fuel per year. (Comparison uses each model's most efficient version.)
Side by side
| Kia Sedona | Pontiac Montana | |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints (NHTSA) | 328 | 161 |
| Most reported problem | Electrical system | Fuel system |
| Crashes and fires | 26 and 25 | 3 and 1 |
| Typical mileage at complaint | 47,000 miles | 60,000 miles |
| Recalls | 3 | 3 |
| Fuel economy, combined | 16 MPG | 20 MPG |
| City and highway | 14 and 18 | 17 and 24 |
| Yearly fuel cost (EPA) | $4,200 | $3,350 |
What the numbers say
NHTSA has 328 complaints for the Kia Sedona and 161 for the Pontiac Montana. Complaint counts depend heavily on how many of each vehicle were sold, so a higher count does not by itself mean a less reliable car.
Safety recalls on file: 3 for the Kia Sedona, 3 for the Pontiac Montana.